Leadership. Strategy. Innovation.

Assigning fault in Connecticut multi-vehicle accidents

Accidents involving multiple vehicles can be complex. When it happens, determining who is at fault can be complicated. One important concept to understand is comparative negligence.

Connecticut’s modified comparative negligence rule

Comparative negligence is a legal principle used to assign responsibility after an accident. In Connecticut, this means each driver involved may bear some degree of fault. Even if you were partially at fault, you might still recover damages. 

Connecticut follows a modified comparative negligence rule. If the insurance company finds you to be more than 50% at fault, you cannot recover damages. For example, if you are 30% at fault and another driver is 70% at fault, you can recover 70% of your damages. However, if your fault exceeds 50%, you are not eligible for compensation.

Investigating multi-vehicle accidents

When an accident involves multiple cars, the investigation becomes crucial. Authorities look at various factors such as driver behavior, road conditions, and vehicle positions. They analyze each driver’s contribution to the accident to determine their level of fault. They also collect evidence as part of the investigation process. This includes taking photographs, securing witness statements, and documenting road conditions. 

Insurance considerations

Insurance companies play a significant role in multi-vehicle accidents. They review the gathered evidence to decide on the fault percentages. These percentages affect how much each insurer pays out. Understanding how comparative negligence influences insurance claims can help you manage expectations.

Moving forward with clarity

Grasping the concept of comparative negligence empowers you. It allows you to understand the nuances of fault and compensation in multi-vehicle accidents. The knowledge can make a significant difference in the aftermath of an accident, helping you make informed decisions without unnecessary stress.